@article{actualisation_de_la_ca00, title = {Actualisation de la charte documentaire de la BnF. La politique d’enrichissement des collections}, author = {Bonnel, Sylvie}, year = {2016}, number = {9}, pages = {32-41}, journal = {Bulletin des biblioth\`eques de France}, url = {http://bbf.enssib.fr/consulter/bbf-2016-09-0032-004.pdf}, } @inproceedings{la_selection_de_64e9, title = {La s\'election de sites web dans une biblioth\`eque nationale encyclop\'edique : une politique documentaire partag\'ee pour le d\'ep\^ot l\'egal de l’internet \`a la BnF}, author = {Bonnel, Sylvie and Oury, Cl\'ement}, year = {2014}, date = {18/08/2014}, address = {Lyon, Palais des Congr\`es, Auditorium Lumi\`ere}, publisher = {\\{IFLA\\}}, series = {\\{IFLA\\} \\{WLIC\\} 2014. Session 107 - National libraries and the cultural heritage in the digital age - National Libraries}, translatedtitle = {Selecting websites in an encyclopaedic national library: a shared collection policy for internet legal deposit at the BnF}, abstract = {En quelques ann\'ees, le web est devenu l’un des principaux vecteurs d’expression et de consommation culturelles de la soci\'et\'e fran\c caise ; les publications en ligne ont rejoint notre patrimoine. Celui-ci est d’autant plus pr\'ecieux qu’il est fragile. En France, il a \'et\'e d\'ecid\'e d’inscrire la mission de conservation de l’internet dans le sillage pluris\'eculaire du d\'ep\^ot l\'egal. Cependant, l’adaptation de ce dispositif juridique et scientifique \`a un espace de diffusion aussi vaste et \'etendu n’a rien d’\'evident. La BnF d\'efinit son p\'erim\`etre de collecte par une s\'erie de restrictions successives : juridiques, techniques et \'economiques. Pour assurer la repr\'esentativit\'e de son d\'ep\^ot l\'egal, la BnF a \'egalement adopt\'e un mod\`ele original d’archivage, qui associe des collectes « larges » du domaine national et des approches plus cibl\'ees de sites identifi\'es par des biblioth\'ecaires de la BnF ou par des partenaires. La BnF a ainsi \'et\'e amen\'ee \`a appliquer des logiques de s\'election dans un cadre de d\'ep\^ot l\'egal. \`A cette fin, chaque d\'epartement associ\'e \`a la collecte du web a \'elabor\'e, au fil des exp\'erimentations, sa propre strat\'egie documentaire. Les « correspondants » du d\'ep\^ot l\'egal du web ont adopt\'e des logiques non pas contradictoires mais compl\'ementaires : s\'election / \'echantillonnage, continuit\'e des collections / exploration de nouveaux territoires. C’est d\'esormais \`a une synth\`ese de ces diff\'erentes politiques que la BnF doit s’atteler, dans le cadre de la refonte de sa charte documentaire et dans un contexte o\`u les contraintes budg\'etaires appellent \`a la d\'efinition de priorit\'es plus affirm\'ees. \  In the space of a few years, the web has become one of the main channels of cultural expression and consumption in French society; online publications have become part of our heritage. This heritage is all the more precious due to its fragile nature. In France, it has been decided to include the preservation of the internet in the centuries-old tradition of legal deposit. However, adapting this legal and scientific framework to such a vast and wide-ranging space for the circulation of information is far from simple. The BnF defines the scope of its internet collection by a series of concentric restrictions: legal, technical and economic. To ensure that its legal deposit stays representative, the BnF has also adopted an original archiving model, combining broad crawls of the national domain with more focused approaches for sites identified by BnF librarians or by partners. The BnF has thus been led to apply principles of selection within the context of legal deposit. To this end, each department that participates in the harvesting has developed, by means of successive experiments, its own documentary strategy. The web legal deposit “corresponding officers” have adopted approaches that are not contradictory but rather complementary: selection/sampling, continuity of collections/exploration of new territories. The BnF must now work on bringing together these different policies, in the context of the renewal of its collection development charter and against a backdrop of budgetary constraints that require the definition of clear priorities.}, }